Staff augmentation vs hiring vs outsourcingFair question.
Here is the honest table.
Sometimes you should hire. Sometimes a freelancer is right. This page says when, including when it is not us.
Four ways to get the work done.
The last column is us; the other three are fair
| Hire in-house | Big outsourcer | Freelancers | Hopsig | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First commit | After the recruiting cycle | After the statement of work and the bench | Days, if you find the right one | 10 working days |
| Who you get | Whoever applied | Whoever was free | One person, as good as their last job | Named engineers you interview first, led by a senior |
| Who manages them | You | An account manager | You | We manage the person; you direct the work |
| Leaving | Notice period, severance, a gap | Contract term, often a year | Whenever, both ways | 30 days, either side |
| IP and code | Yours | Check the MSA | Check the contract | Yours on payment, in your repo from day one |
| Cost shape | Salary, taxes, equipment, recruiter fee, ramp-up | Blended rate, minimum team size | Day rate; no cover when they are ill | Day rate; cover and holidays handled; no recruiter fee |
| Right choice when | The work is permanent and core | You need forty people and a programme office | A fortnight of specialist work | Three to twelve months of capacity, senior-led and measured |